Journal of Refractive Surgery
Online Advanced Release
Current Issue
Back Issues
About the Journal
Info for Authors
Contributor Awards
Article Submission
Contact Us
Advertising Info
Article Reprints
Buy a Book
Terms and Conditions
Careers at SLACK Inc.

e-contents - Sign up today
Subscribe to this Journal
Get daily Ophthalmic news at the OSN SuperSite
ISRS: International Society of Refractive Surgery

Faktorovich, Femtodynamics

Original Articles:
A 14-year Follow-up of Photorefractive Keratectomy

Journal of Refractive Surgery  Vol. 25   No. 6   June 2009

See the Full text
Graziano Bricola, MD, PhD; Riccardo Scotto, OD; Maurizio Mete, MD; Simonetta Cerruti, MD and Carlo E. Traverso, MD

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcome of myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This prospective study included 31 patients (49 eyes) who underwent PRK between 1991 and 1993. A Summit UV200 excimer laser was used. Patients were divided into two groups—low myopia: preoperative <6.00 diopters (D) (range: –1.50 to –5.75 D) (n=19); and high myopia: preoperative ≥6.00 D (range: –6.00 to –13.00 D) (n=12). Long-term postoperative follow-up was every 2 years up to 14 years. Refraction, visual acuity, corneal status, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated. At 14 years, corneal topography and endothelial cell count were performed.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) for the low myopia group was –0.17±0.8, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) logMAR was –0.06±0.55, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) logMAR was 0.00±1.00. The high myopia group had a final MRSE of –0.67±1.4, UCVA logMAR –0.11±0.55, and BSCVA logMAR –0.03±1.00. At 14 years, BSCVA for most eyes was at least equal to preoperative BSCVA. In both groups, haze increased between 3 and 6 months, then declined in the first year. A temporary increase of IOP was seen in 4 eyes. Complications were minor haze (2 eyes), transient anisocoria (9 eyes), and intraepithelial hemosiderin deposits (4 eyes). No abnormalities in endothelial cell count or morphology, astigmatism, or ectasia were noted. Three patients reported night vision disturbance, but the majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome based on subjective questionnaire (low myopia group: 84%; high myopia group: 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the safety of myopic PRK. [J Refract Surg. 2009;25:545-552.]

doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090512-09

AUTHORS

From Centro di Ricerca Clinica e Laboratorio per il Glaucoma e la Cornea – Clinica Oculistica, Di.N.O.G., University of Genoa, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

This study was supported in part by a PhD grant to Università degli Studi di Genova from “Fondazione CARIGE,” Genova, Italy.

The authors have no proprietary interest in the materials presented herein.

The authors thank Valentina Scanarotti and Loredana Fehl for their diligent help with compilation and logistics.

Correspondence: Carlo E. Traverso, MD, Centro di Ricerca Clinica e Laboratorio per il Glaucoma e la Cornea – Clinica Oculistica, Di.N.O.G., University of Genoa, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16100 Genoa, Italy. Tel/Fax: 39 0103 538 468; E-mail: mc8620@mclink.it

Received: October 3, 2007; Accepted: October 7, 2008

Posted online: December 15, 2008

See the Full text